Saturday, December 14, 2013

Why Ear Cropping May Not Be Best For Your Dog

By Jeannie Chapman


With extremes for the debate surrounding ear cropping, there are a number of animal laws that have come up against the practice and requires that pet owners exercise responsibility to make the right decisions with regards to the well-being of animals. Owners have expressed difficulty to find reliable vets to perform the procedure focusing exclusively on appearance. There are a number of measures associated with such modification and should be explored before a final decision is made.

Many pure bred dogs including pitbulls and dobermans have the ears cropped because of the visual appeal the it provides the animal. Such procedures are invasive and only performed on pets younger than 12 weeks of age. It does not serve any medical or functional purposes, but merely an aesthetic value and a difference in the appearance of the beloved canine.

If you source pups from a breeder, the crop should be performed once you have received the animal, but in many cases, you as the owner will have to make the difficult decision as to whether or not to trim the ears. Cropping is a surgical procedure involving the trimming of part of the ear and placing supportive inserts to maintain an erect and alert appearance. The cartilage and tissues may require support for a few weeks post procedure to provide the animal with the appropriate appeal.

With time there are many breeds that have undergone the experience of cropping because it was believed to create more of a powerful and attractive appearance. The measures ranging from cropped ears to docked tails have come under scrutiny because it only serves a cosmetic purpose. All pets will have to experience long recovery times that include a tremendous amount of pain and the possibility of infection.

The practice is considered unnecessary and in most cases cruel because it causes distress for canines. Many organizations have fought for animal rights and believe that the surgery only serves to appease owners, but does not offer any form of benefits for the animals. More people are attempting to crop without vet support resulting in severely disfigured animals.

One of the benefits of shorter erect ears is the decrease in the susceptibility for infections. Although many vets would argue about such advantages, there are many pet owners who believe that improved air flow can prevent against the accumulation of moisture and bacteria in the canal. If you wish to have the procedure performed, it is important to find a reliable and reputable veterinarian.

There are numerous styles of cropped ears. Animal doctors should be qualified to deliver the outcome you are looking for. If you fail to research the right professionals it could lead to scarring and infection.

Ear cropping remains of the most contested procedures. Many vets are no longer agreeing to implement the changes because it does not prove beneficial. If you are going to have your pup altered ensure that a qualified and experienced animal doctor is sought.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment